DeepSeek HarnessvsWorkout.cool
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| DeepSeek Harness | Workout.cool | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 264 471 | 8 650 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +8 479 | +155 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 1 |
| Latest release | — | v1.3.2 · 7 Dec 2025 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
DeepSeek Harness scores 87/100 against 66/100 for Workout.cool, so it is the safer default.
Workout.cool ships more often: 1 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for DeepSeek Harness.
If you want the quickest setup, Workout.cool is easier to run; DeepSeek Harness needs more configuration.
DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+8 479 stars in 30 days).
DeepSeek Harness details →Workout.cool details →