DeepSeek HarnessvsvLLM
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| DeepSeek Harness | vLLM | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 91/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #3 of 25 in LLM Inference |
| GitHub stars | 264 716 | 95 782 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +8 724 | +3 230 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 14 |
| Latest release | — | v0.32.0 · 17 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
vLLM scores 91/100 against 87/100 for DeepSeek Harness, so it is the safer default.
vLLM ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for DeepSeek Harness.
DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+8 724 stars in 30 days).
DeepSeek Harness details →vLLM details →