DeepSeek HarnessvsUrbit
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| DeepSeek Harness | Urbit | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 63/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #3 of 8 in Operating System |
| GitHub stars | 265 053 | 3 622 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +9 061 | +5 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 6 |
| Latest release | — | 408k-2 · 4 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | hoon |
Which one should you pick?
DeepSeek Harness scores 87/100 against 63/100 for Urbit, so it is the safer default.
Urbit ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for DeepSeek Harness.
If you want the quickest setup, DeepSeek Harness is easier to run; Urbit needs more configuration.
DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+9 061 stars in 30 days).
DeepSeek Harness details →Urbit details →