DeepSeek Harnessvsuncompressed
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| DeepSeek Harness | uncompressed | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 47/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #71 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 265 481 | 213 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +9 489 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 1 |
| Latest release | — | v1.0.0 · 4 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
DeepSeek Harness scores 87/100 against 47/100 for uncompressed, so it is the safer default.
uncompressed ships more often: 1 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for DeepSeek Harness.
If you want the quickest setup, DeepSeek Harness is easier to run; uncompressed needs more configuration.
DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+9 489 stars in 30 days).
DeepSeek Harness details →uncompressed details →