DeepSeek HarnessvsTypecho
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| DeepSeek Harness | Typecho | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #1 of 24 in Blogging |
| GitHub stars | 265 139 | 12 456 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +9 147 | +9 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 2 |
| Latest release | — | ci · 17 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | PHP |
Which one should you pick?
DeepSeek Harness scores 87/100 against 66/100 for Typecho, so it is the safer default.
Typecho ships more often: 2 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for DeepSeek Harness.
If you want the quickest setup, Typecho is easier to run; DeepSeek Harness needs more configuration.
DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+9 147 stars in 30 days).
DeepSeek Harness details →Typecho details →