DeepSeek HarnessvsTypebot
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| DeepSeek Harness | Typebot | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 70/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #1 of 6 in Chatbot |
| GitHub stars | 264 755 | 10 585 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +8 763 | +224 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 8 |
| Latest release | — | v3.19.1 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
DeepSeek Harness scores 87/100 against 70/100 for Typebot, so it is the safer default.
Typebot ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for DeepSeek Harness.
DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+8 763 stars in 30 days).
DeepSeek Harness details →Typebot details →