DeepSeek HarnessvsTryton
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| DeepSeek Harness | Tryton | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 68/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #3 of 14 in ERP |
| GitHub stars | 264 755 | — |
| Stars, last 30 days | +8 763 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | — |
Which one should you pick?
DeepSeek Harness scores 87/100 against 68/100 for Tryton, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, DeepSeek Harness is easier to run; Tryton needs more configuration.
DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+8 763 stars in 30 days).
DeepSeek Harness details →Tryton details →