DeepSeek HarnessvsTrinity
Two self-hosted AI Agents projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| DeepSeek Harness | Trinity | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 57/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #60 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 264 652 | 711 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +8 660 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 4 |
| Latest release | — | v1.0.0 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
DeepSeek Harness scores 87/100 against 57/100 for Trinity, so it is the safer default.
Trinity ships more often: 4 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for DeepSeek Harness.
If you want the quickest setup, DeepSeek Harness is easier to run; Trinity needs more configuration.
DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+8 660 stars in 30 days).
DeepSeek Harness details →Trinity details →All AI Agents projects →