DeepSeek Harnessvstiledesk
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| DeepSeek Harness | tiledesk | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #46 of 110 in Chat |
| GitHub stars | 265 139 | 324 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +9 147 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 1 |
| Latest release | — | 1.2.1 · 6 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Mustache |
Which one should you pick?
DeepSeek Harness scores 87/100 against 51/100 for tiledesk, so it is the safer default.
tiledesk ships more often: 1 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for DeepSeek Harness.
If you want the quickest setup, DeepSeek Harness is easier to run; tiledesk needs more configuration.
DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+9 147 stars in 30 days).
DeepSeek Harness details →tiledesk details →