DeepSeek HarnessvsText Generation WebUI
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| DeepSeek Harness | Text Generation WebUI | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #6 of 69 in AI Chat |
| GitHub stars | 264 716 | 47 724 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +8 724 | +24 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 10 |
| Latest release | — | v4.9 · 20 May 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
DeepSeek Harness scores 87/100 against 76/100 for Text Generation WebUI, so it is the safer default.
Text Generation WebUI ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for DeepSeek Harness.
If you want the quickest setup, Text Generation WebUI is easier to run; DeepSeek Harness needs more configuration.
DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+8 724 stars in 30 days).
DeepSeek Harness details →Text Generation WebUI details →