DeepSeek HarnessvsSure
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| DeepSeek Harness | Sure | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 74/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #4 of 62 in Personal Finance |
| GitHub stars | 264 755 | 10 712 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +8 763 | +688 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 15 |
| Latest release | — | v0.7.5-hotfix.3 · 24 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Ruby |
Which one should you pick?
DeepSeek Harness scores 87/100 against 74/100 for Sure, so it is the safer default.
Sure ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for DeepSeek Harness.
If you want the quickest setup, Sure is easier to run; DeepSeek Harness needs more configuration.
DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+8 763 stars in 30 days).
DeepSeek Harness details →Sure details →