DeepSeek Harnessvssglang
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| DeepSeek Harness | sglang | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #4 of 25 in LLM Inference |
| GitHub stars | 264 716 | 38 320 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +8 724 | +1 938 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 17 |
| Latest release | — | v0.5.22 · 15 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
DeepSeek Harness scores 87/100 against 86/100 for sglang, so it is the safer default.
sglang ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for DeepSeek Harness.
If you want the quickest setup, DeepSeek Harness is easier to run; sglang needs more configuration.
DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+8 724 stars in 30 days).
DeepSeek Harness details →sglang details →