DeepSeek Harnessvssentry
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| DeepSeek Harness | sentry | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 80/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #1 of 9 in Application Performance Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 265 690 | 45 678 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +9 698 | +839 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 22 |
| Latest release | — | 26.10.1 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
DeepSeek Harness scores 87/100 against 80/100 for sentry, so it is the safer default.
sentry ships more often: 22 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for DeepSeek Harness.
If you want the quickest setup, DeepSeek Harness is easier to run; sentry needs more configuration.
DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+9 698 stars in 30 days).
DeepSeek Harness details →sentry details →