DeepSeek HarnessvsScienceClaw
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| DeepSeek Harness | ScienceClaw | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 50/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #40 of 120 in AI Assistant |
| GitHub stars | 264 652 | 676 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +8 660 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
DeepSeek Harness scores 87/100 against 50/100 for ScienceClaw, so it is the safer default.
DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+8 660 stars in 30 days).
DeepSeek Harness details →ScienceClaw details →