DeepSeek HarnessvsSaleor
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| DeepSeek Harness | Saleor | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 75/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #2 of 27 in E-commerce |
| GitHub stars | 265 139 | 23 487 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +9 147 | +113 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 80 |
| Latest release | — | 3.23.45 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | BSD-3-Clause |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
DeepSeek Harness scores 87/100 against 75/100 for Saleor, so it is the safer default.
Saleor ships more often: 80 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for DeepSeek Harness.
If you want the quickest setup, DeepSeek Harness is easier to run; Saleor needs more configuration.
DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+9 147 stars in 30 days).
DeepSeek Harness details →Saleor details →