DeepSeek HarnessvsRedis
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| DeepSeek Harness | Redis | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #1 of 38 in Databases |
| GitHub stars | 265 570 | 77 161 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +9 578 | +694 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 36 |
| Latest release | — | 8.10.3 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | C |
Which one should you pick?
DeepSeek Harness scores 87/100 against 86/100 for Redis, so it is the safer default.
Redis ships more often: 36 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for DeepSeek Harness.
DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+9 578 stars in 30 days).
DeepSeek Harness details →Redis details →