DeepSeek HarnessvsRallly
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| DeepSeek Harness | Rallly | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 70/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #1 of 8 in Scheduling & Booking |
| GitHub stars | 265 285 | 5 331 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +9 293 | +62 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 29 |
| Latest release | — | v4.16.3 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
DeepSeek Harness scores 87/100 against 70/100 for Rallly, so it is the safer default.
Rallly ships more often: 29 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for DeepSeek Harness.
If you want the quickest setup, Rallly is easier to run; DeepSeek Harness needs more configuration.
DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+9 293 stars in 30 days).
DeepSeek Harness details →Rallly details →