DeepSeek HarnessvsRadarr
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| DeepSeek Harness | Radarr | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 78/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #3 of 45 in Download Management |
| GitHub stars | 265 139 | 14 671 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +9 147 | +240 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 19 |
| Latest release | — | v7.0.0.10815 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | C |
Which one should you pick?
DeepSeek Harness scores 87/100 against 78/100 for Radarr, so it is the safer default.
Radarr ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for DeepSeek Harness.
If you want the quickest setup, Radarr is easier to run; DeepSeek Harness needs more configuration.
DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+9 147 stars in 30 days).
DeepSeek Harness details →Radarr details →