DeepSeek HarnessvsProject OSRM
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| DeepSeek Harness | Project OSRM | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #2 of 9 in Mapping & GPS |
| GitHub stars | 264 471 | 8 178 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +8 479 | +75 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 16 |
| Latest release | — | v26.10.0 · 1 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | Typescript | C++ |
Which one should you pick?
DeepSeek Harness scores 87/100 against 69/100 for Project OSRM, so it is the safer default.
Project OSRM ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for DeepSeek Harness.
If you want the quickest setup, DeepSeek Harness is easier to run; Project OSRM needs more configuration.
DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+8 479 stars in 30 days).
DeepSeek Harness details →Project OSRM details →