DeepSeek HarnessvsPostHog
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| DeepSeek Harness | PostHog | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 81/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #1 of 27 in Analytics |
| GitHub stars | 264 775 | 40 497 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +8 783 | +588 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 3501 |
| Latest release | — | agent-skills-v0.3891.0 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
DeepSeek Harness scores 87/100 against 81/100 for PostHog, so it is the safer default.
PostHog ships more often: 3501 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for DeepSeek Harness.
If you want the quickest setup, DeepSeek Harness is easier to run; PostHog needs more configuration.
DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+8 783 stars in 30 days).
DeepSeek Harness details →PostHog details →