DeepSeek HarnessvsPhotoPrism
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| DeepSeek Harness | PhotoPrism | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #4 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 265 053 | 40 373 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +9 061 | +138 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 7 |
| Latest release | — | 261007-65faaae5d · 7 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
DeepSeek Harness scores 87/100 against 76/100 for PhotoPrism, so it is the safer default.
PhotoPrism ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for DeepSeek Harness.
DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+9 061 stars in 30 days).
DeepSeek Harness details →PhotoPrism details →