DeepSeek HarnessvsPanWatch
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| DeepSeek Harness | PanWatch | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 62/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #3 of 9 in Fintech |
| GitHub stars | 264 775 | 2 269 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +8 783 | +118 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 12 |
| Latest release | — | 0.20.0 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
DeepSeek Harness scores 87/100 against 62/100 for PanWatch, so it is the safer default.
PanWatch ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for DeepSeek Harness.
If you want the quickest setup, PanWatch is easier to run; DeepSeek Harness needs more configuration.
DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+8 783 stars in 30 days).
DeepSeek Harness details →PanWatch details →