DeepSeek HarnessvsOtari
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| DeepSeek Harness | Otari | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 56/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #14 of 39 in API Gateway |
| GitHub stars | 265 285 | 752 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +9 293 | +1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 10 |
| Latest release | — | v0.33.0 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
DeepSeek Harness scores 87/100 against 56/100 for Otari, so it is the safer default.
Otari ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for DeepSeek Harness.
DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+9 293 stars in 30 days).
DeepSeek Harness details →Otari details →