DeepSeek HarnessvsOpenWrt
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| DeepSeek Harness | OpenWrt | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 83/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #1 of 8 in Operating System |
| GitHub stars | 265 139 | 28 969 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +9 147 | +456 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 10 |
| Latest release | — | v25.12.6 · 18 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | C |
Which one should you pick?
DeepSeek Harness scores 87/100 against 83/100 for OpenWrt, so it is the safer default.
OpenWrt ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for DeepSeek Harness.
DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+9 147 stars in 30 days).
DeepSeek Harness details →OpenWrt details →