DeepSeek HarnessvsOpengeni
Two self-hosted AI Agents projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| DeepSeek Harness | Opengeni | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 50/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #97 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 264 652 | 212 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +8 660 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 17 |
| Latest release | — | opengeni-artifact-runtime-493e35c06cff2ed5a8fea6595c4e5ec56fdc8bfe · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
DeepSeek Harness scores 87/100 against 50/100 for Opengeni, so it is the safer default.
Opengeni ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for DeepSeek Harness.
If you want the quickest setup, DeepSeek Harness is easier to run; Opengeni needs more configuration.
DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+8 660 stars in 30 days).
DeepSeek Harness details →Opengeni details →All AI Agents projects →