DeepSeek HarnessvsOpenEMR
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| DeepSeek Harness | OpenEMR | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 72/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #1 of 5 in Healthcare |
| GitHub stars | 265 285 | 5 556 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +9 293 | +88 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 6 |
| Latest release | — | v8_5_0 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | PHP |
Which one should you pick?
DeepSeek Harness scores 87/100 against 72/100 for OpenEMR, so it is the safer default.
OpenEMR ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for DeepSeek Harness.
If you want the quickest setup, DeepSeek Harness is easier to run; OpenEMR needs more configuration.
DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+9 293 stars in 30 days).
DeepSeek Harness details →OpenEMR details →