DeepSeek HarnessvsOllama
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| DeepSeek Harness | Ollama | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 95/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #1 of 25 in LLM Inference |
| GitHub stars | 264 775 | 185 141 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +8 783 | +3 593 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 50 |
| Latest release | — | v0.40.12 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Ollama scores 95/100 against 87/100 for DeepSeek Harness, so it is the safer default.
Ollama ships more often: 50 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for DeepSeek Harness.
If you want the quickest setup, Ollama is easier to run; DeepSeek Harness needs more configuration.
DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+8 783 stars in 30 days).
DeepSeek Harness details →Ollama details →