DeepSeek HarnessvsObscura
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| DeepSeek Harness | Obscura | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 75/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #3 of 16 in Web Scraping |
| GitHub stars | 264 652 | 29 526 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +8 660 | +442 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 10 |
| Latest release | — | v0.2.5 · 17 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
DeepSeek Harness scores 87/100 against 75/100 for Obscura, so it is the safer default.
Obscura ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for DeepSeek Harness.
If you want the quickest setup, Obscura is easier to run; DeepSeek Harness needs more configuration.
DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+8 660 stars in 30 days).
DeepSeek Harness details →Obscura details →