DeepSeek Harnessvsnostr-watch
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| DeepSeek Harness | nostr-watch | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 42/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #84 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 265 285 | 199 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +9 293 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 3 |
| Latest release | — | nocap-info-adapter-default@v1.2.0 · 11 Mar 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
DeepSeek Harness scores 87/100 against 42/100 for nostr-watch, so it is the safer default.
nostr-watch ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for DeepSeek Harness.
If you want the quickest setup, DeepSeek Harness is easier to run; nostr-watch needs more configuration.
DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+9 293 stars in 30 days).
DeepSeek Harness details →nostr-watch details →