DeepSeek HarnessvsNomad
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| DeepSeek Harness | Nomad | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #2 of 11 in Container Orchestration |
| GitHub stars | 264 471 | 17 045 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +8 479 | +76 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 16 |
| Latest release | — | v2.0.7 · 18 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
DeepSeek Harness scores 87/100 against 76/100 for Nomad, so it is the safer default.
Nomad ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for DeepSeek Harness.
DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+8 479 stars in 30 days).
DeepSeek Harness details →Nomad details →