DeepSeek Harnessvsmqttui
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| DeepSeek Harness | mqttui | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #8 of 10 in IoT |
| GitHub stars | 265 285 | 224 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +9 293 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 2 |
| Latest release | — | v2.0.2 · 25 Mar 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
DeepSeek Harness scores 87/100 against 48/100 for mqttui, so it is the safer default.
mqttui ships more often: 2 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for DeepSeek Harness.
DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+9 293 stars in 30 days).
DeepSeek Harness details →mqttui details →