DeepSeek Harnessvsmira-OSS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| DeepSeek Harness | mira-OSS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #47 of 120 in AI Assistant |
| GitHub stars | 264 716 | 481 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +8 724 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 16 |
| Latest release | — | v2026.10.21-2.1.2 · 21 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
DeepSeek Harness scores 87/100 against 49/100 for mira-OSS, so it is the safer default.
mira-OSS ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for DeepSeek Harness.
If you want the quickest setup, DeepSeek Harness is easier to run; mira-OSS needs more configuration.
DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+8 724 stars in 30 days).
DeepSeek Harness details →mira-OSS details →