DeepSeek HarnessvsJ.A.R.V.I.S
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| DeepSeek Harness | J.A.R.V.I.S | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 38/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #10 of 11 in Voice Assistants |
| GitHub stars | 264 652 | 199 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +8 660 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
DeepSeek Harness scores 87/100 against 38/100 for J.A.R.V.I.S, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, DeepSeek Harness is easier to run; J.A.R.V.I.S needs more configuration.
DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+8 660 stars in 30 days).
DeepSeek Harness details →J.A.R.V.I.S details →