cups-avahi-airprintvsFleet
Two self-hosted Device Management projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| cups-avahi-airprint | Fleet | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 47/100 | 67/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 11 in Device Management | #1 of 11 in Device Management |
| GitHub stars | 221 | 7 064 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 3 |
| Latest release | — | fleet-v4.93.2 · 21 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Shell | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Fleet scores 67/100 against 47/100 for cups-avahi-airprint, so it is the safer default.
Fleet ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for cups-avahi-airprint.
If you want the quickest setup, cups-avahi-airprint is easier to run; Fleet needs more configuration.
cups-avahi-airprint details →Fleet details →All Device Management projects →
Swap a project
Keep cups-avahi-airprint, compare it with
Keep Fleet, compare it with