cups-avahi-airprintvsTasmota
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| cups-avahi-airprint | Tasmota | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 47/100 | 79/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 11 in Device Management | #3 of 104 in Home Automation |
| GitHub stars | 221 | 24 940 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +168 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 6 |
| Latest release | — | v16.0.0 · 16 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Shell | C |
Which one should you pick?
Tasmota scores 79/100 against 47/100 for cups-avahi-airprint, so it is the safer default.
Tasmota ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for cups-avahi-airprint.
If you want the quickest setup, cups-avahi-airprint is easier to run; Tasmota needs more configuration.
Tasmota is growing faster right now (+168 stars in 30 days).
cups-avahi-airprint details →Tasmota details →
Swap a project
Keep cups-avahi-airprint, compare it with
Keep Tasmota, compare it with