CryptPadvsOpenELIS Global
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| CryptPad | OpenELIS Global | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 54/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 6 in Office Suites | #3 of 5 in Healthcare |
| GitHub stars | 8 031 | 278 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +76 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 8 |
| Latest release | 2026.10.0 · 21 Oct 2026 | 3.3.0 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MPL-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Java |
Which one should you pick?
CryptPad scores 71/100 against 54/100 for OpenELIS Global, so it is the safer default.
OpenELIS Global ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for CryptPad.
If you want the quickest setup, OpenELIS Global is easier to run; CryptPad needs more configuration.
CryptPad is growing faster right now (+76 stars in 30 days).
CryptPad details →OpenELIS Global details →
Swap a project
Keep CryptPad, compare it with
Keep OpenELIS Global, compare it with