crowdsecvsUpptime
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| crowdsec | Upptime | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #10 of 78 in Security | #3 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 15 358 | 17 183 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +411 | +-1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.8.2 · 26 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Markdown |
Which one should you pick?
crowdsec scores 76/100 against 69/100 for Upptime, so it is the safer default.
crowdsec ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Upptime.
If you want the quickest setup, Upptime is easier to run; crowdsec needs more configuration.
crowdsec is growing faster right now (+411 stars in 30 days).
crowdsec details →Upptime details →
Swap a project
Keep crowdsec, compare it with
Keep Upptime, compare it with