keycloakvsUpptime
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| keycloak | Upptime | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 40 in Authentication | #3 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 37 573 | 17 183 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +606 | +-1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 | 0 |
| Latest release | 26.8.1 · 13 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Java | Markdown |
Which one should you pick?
keycloak scores 86/100 against 69/100 for Upptime, so it is the safer default.
keycloak ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Upptime.
If you want the quickest setup, Upptime is easier to run; keycloak needs more configuration.
keycloak is growing faster right now (+606 stars in 30 days).
keycloak details →Upptime details →
Swap a project
Keep keycloak, compare it with
Keep Upptime, compare it with