CoturnvsPaddleOCR
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Coturn | PaddleOCR | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 85/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 1 in WebRTC | #1 of 4 in OCR |
| GitHub stars | 14 529 | 91 912 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +99 | +471 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 8 |
| Latest release | docker/4.18.0-r0 · 8 Sept 2026 | v3.7.0 · 11 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | C | Python |
Which one should you pick?
PaddleOCR scores 85/100 against 71/100 for Coturn, so it is the safer default.
Coturn ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for PaddleOCR.
PaddleOCR is growing faster right now (+471 stars in 30 days).
Coturn details →PaddleOCR details →
Swap a project
Keep Coturn, compare it with
Keep PaddleOCR, compare it with