Janus WebRTC ServervsPaddleOCR
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Janus WebRTC Server | PaddleOCR | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 70/100 | 85/100 |
| Rank in category | #9 of 118 in Media Server | #1 of 4 in OCR |
| GitHub stars | 9 197 | 91 926 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +27 | +485 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 8 |
| Latest release | — | v3.7.0 · 11 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | C | Python |
Which one should you pick?
PaddleOCR scores 85/100 against 70/100 for Janus WebRTC Server, so it is the safer default.
PaddleOCR ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Janus WebRTC Server.
If you want the quickest setup, PaddleOCR is easier to run; Janus WebRTC Server needs more configuration.
PaddleOCR is growing faster right now (+485 stars in 30 days).
Janus WebRTC Server details →PaddleOCR details →
Swap a project
Keep Janus WebRTC Server, compare it with
Keep PaddleOCR, compare it with