copypartyvsSuper Productivity
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| copyparty | Super Productivity | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 83/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 86 in File Sharing | #1 of 34 in Task Management |
| GitHub stars | 47 169 | 23 233 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +396 | +1 012 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 22 |
| Latest release | v1.20.26 · 14 Oct 2026 | v19.3.1 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Super Productivity scores 83/100 against 82/100 for copyparty, so it is the safer default.
Super Productivity ships more often: 22 stable releases in the past year, against 19 for copyparty.
If you want the quickest setup, Super Productivity is easier to run; copyparty needs more configuration.
Super Productivity is growing faster right now (+1 012 stars in 30 days).
copyparty details →Super Productivity details →
Swap a project
Keep copyparty, compare it with
Keep Super Productivity, compare it with