copypartyvsmitmproxy
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| copyparty | mitmproxy | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 86 in File Sharing | #1 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 47 175 | 46 468 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +392 | +1 324 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 5 |
| Latest release | v1.20.26 · 14 Oct 2026 | v12.3.1 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
mitmproxy scores 86/100 against 82/100 for copyparty, so it is the safer default.
copyparty ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for mitmproxy.
mitmproxy is growing faster right now (+1 324 stars in 30 days).
copyparty details →mitmproxy details →
Swap a project
Keep copyparty, compare it with
Keep mitmproxy, compare it with