Cloudrevevsmitmproxy
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Cloudreve | mitmproxy | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Cloud Storage | #1 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 28 900 | 46 471 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +139 | +1 327 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 5 |
| Latest release | 4.19.1 · 18 Sept 2026 | v12.3.1 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
mitmproxy scores 86/100 against 77/100 for Cloudreve, so it is the safer default.
Cloudreve ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for mitmproxy.
If you want the quickest setup, Cloudreve is easier to run; mitmproxy needs more configuration.
mitmproxy is growing faster right now (+1 327 stars in 30 days).
Cloudreve details →mitmproxy details →