coolifyvsqm-music
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| coolify | qm-music | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 89/100 | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 14 in Platform as a Service | #20 of 59 in Music Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 65 229 | 588 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 984 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 45 | 11 |
| Latest release | v4.5.3 · 28 Oct 2026 | v2.5.0 · 10 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | PHP | Java |
Which one should you pick?
coolify scores 89/100 against 51/100 for qm-music, so it is the safer default.
coolify ships more often: 45 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for qm-music.
If you want the quickest setup, qm-music is easier to run; coolify needs more configuration.
coolify is growing faster right now (+2 984 stars in 30 days).
coolify details →qm-music details →