CookCLIvsVigil365
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| CookCLI | Vigil365 | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 61/100 | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 18 in Recipe Management | #46 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 1 424 | 284 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +33 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 21 | 2 |
| Latest release | v0.39.0 · 24 Oct 2026 | v1.1.0 · 28 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Rust | C# |
Which one should you pick?
CookCLI scores 61/100 against 49/100 for Vigil365, so it is the safer default.
CookCLI ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Vigil365.
If you want the quickest setup, CookCLI is easier to run; Vigil365 needs more configuration.
CookCLI is growing faster right now (+33 stars in 30 days).
CookCLI details →Vigil365 details →
Swap a project
Keep CookCLI, compare it with
Keep Vigil365, compare it with