CookCLIvsnorish
Two self-hosted Recipe Management projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| CookCLI | norish | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 61/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 18 in Recipe Management | #3 of 18 in Recipe Management |
| GitHub stars | 1 422 | 1 420 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +32 | +192 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 21 | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.39.0 · 24 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Rust | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
CookCLI and norish score the same (61/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.
CookCLI ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for norish.
If you want the quickest setup, CookCLI is easier to run; norish needs more configuration.
norish is growing faster right now (+192 stars in 30 days).
CookCLI details →norish details →All Recipe Management projects →
Swap a project
Keep CookCLI, compare it with
Keep norish, compare it with