CookCLIvsTrenova
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| CookCLI | Trenova | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 61/100 | 41/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 18 in Recipe Management | #2 of 2 in Fleet Management |
| GitHub stars | 1 422 | 314 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +32 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 21 | 9 |
| Latest release | v0.39.0 · 24 Oct 2026 | v0.10.5 · 13 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Rust | Go |
Which one should you pick?
CookCLI scores 61/100 against 41/100 for Trenova, so it is the safer default.
CookCLI ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for Trenova.
If you want the quickest setup, CookCLI is easier to run; Trenova needs more configuration.
CookCLI is growing faster right now (+32 stars in 30 days).
CookCLI details →Trenova details →
Swap a project
Keep CookCLI, compare it with
Keep Trenova, compare it with