CookCLIvsTorollo
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| CookCLI | Torollo | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 61/100 | 47/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 18 in Recipe Management | #15 of 30 in Education |
| GitHub stars | 1 423 | 449 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +32 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 21 | 10 |
| Latest release | v0.39.0 · 24 Oct 2026 | v1.2.5 · 10 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Rust | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
CookCLI scores 61/100 against 47/100 for Torollo, so it is the safer default.
CookCLI ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Torollo.
CookCLI is growing faster right now (+32 stars in 30 days).
CookCLI details →Torollo details →
Swap a project
Keep CookCLI, compare it with
Keep Torollo, compare it with