ConvertXvsOctoprint
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ConvertX | Octoprint | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 10 in File Conversion | #1 of 22 in 3D Printing |
| GitHub stars | 19 226 | 9 168 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +174 | +58 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 5 |
| Latest release | v0.20.0 · 28 Oct 2026 | 1.11.8 · 23 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
ConvertX scores 74/100 against 73/100 for Octoprint, so it is the safer default.
ConvertX ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for Octoprint.
ConvertX is growing faster right now (+174 stars in 30 days).
ConvertX details →Octoprint details →