Concatvswger
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Concat | wger | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 18 in Video Processing | #1 of 31 in Health & Fitness |
| GitHub stars | 12 577 | 7 203 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 578 | +240 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 4 |
| Latest release | v0.2.8 · 20 Oct 2026 | 2.7 · 3 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Rust | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Concat scores 82/100 against 73/100 for wger, so it is the safer default.
Concat ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for wger.
If you want the quickest setup, Concat is easier to run; wger needs more configuration.
Concat is growing faster right now (+2 578 stars in 30 days).
Concat details →wger details →
Swap a project
Keep Concat, compare it with
Keep wger, compare it with